In both the movie and the book The Reluctant Fundamentalist, we
repeatedly see “focus on the fundamentals”. When Jim says it to Changez, he
wants him to focus on the well-being of the business and do what is best for
Underwood Samson. We also see different kinds of fundamentalists, more so in
the movie than the book. We see the corporate fundamentalists, through
Underwood Sampson, the al-Qaeda, through wanting to “share the truth” of the
Qu’ran, and Changez and Erica have their own fundamentals. In the book I really
did not notice the differing fundamentalists. I think Nair wanted to make use
of the title more.
The most noticeable and annoying
change from the book to the movie was how different Erica was. In the book,
Erica is so fragile and depressed and we hardly see that in Nair’s adaptation.
In the movie, the audience does not fully get to see how Erica has affected
Changez mentally. Yes, we see how in love he thinks he is, but we do not see
how he basically cannot stop thinking about her. His relationship with Erica
changed how he viewed certain situations. I do like how there was more dialogue
between Changez and his dinner guest in the movie (not just Changez’s point of
view). It gave the viewer a lot more certainty about who this American was,
rather than questioning how the book ended.
I cannot think of an answer about
the Pakistani dream. Honestly if I was living somewhere where protests and war
and weapons were right in front of me, I would not stay there longer than
necessary. I would hope their dream would be to focus on what is most
important- family, friends, health, etc.- the fundamentals.
I am interested in how, had you been making the film, you would have cast Erica. Why do you think Hamid changed her character when writing the screenplay?
ReplyDeleteSpring