The film The
Cow was a peculiar story. It tells the tale of a man, Hassan. and his cow.
The two share a strange relationship other than master and livestock. Hassan seems to have a great love for the
animal as if it was his own child. He even plays with it and eats its food as
if the cow would enjoy the attention. The cow showed little to any reaction, or
emotion. Once the cow passes away, the entire village in which Hassan resides
try their best to prevent him from discovering it. Inevitably he realizes what
has happened and that's where the film gets really weird. Hassan essentially
becomes his cow. He loved his cow so
much that the loss was too devastating, he no longer knew how to function. This
was so odd. I understand how easy it is
to get attached to something, but to completely lose it when the object of
obsession is gone makes no sense. Nothing in this world is forever after all. His
attachment was too deep-seated. It also seemed like the cow was the only thing
in his life that gave him meaning. His wife and everything else were
unimportant. He didn't even seem to hold any affection for his wife, which made
me think that their marriage was probably arranged and was just an obligation
he could not refuse.
The death of the cow was beneficial in other terms.
It brought the village together with a common goal: to get rid of the body and
prevent Hassan from finding out. The village is all together on the decisions
of what to do. Hassan's journey into insanity was beneficial as well. It helped
them get rid of a group of thieves. So although Hassan's world came crashing down,
the village seemed to better with the exception of an insane resident and no
cow to provide milk. It was odd how they tried to help Hassan for what seemed
like a few days, or at least a week and then suddenly they couldn't deal with
him anymore. The way in which they got rid of him reminded me of how they got
rid of the cow. Tied up and dragged away, Hassan and the cow both became
obsolete tools. Can a person even be
considered obsolete? Hassan would have died eventually if he continued his
journey, so why get rid of him? It's not like they had to take care of him, he
wasn't their responsibility.
The article provides greater insight on The Cow. The creator, Gholam-Hossein Saedi,
provided a realism to the film. It made me notice other parts of the film, such
as how the narrator had no real emotion towards what was going on. Also the
villagers reactions to the film were very realistic, they didn't freak out when
Hassan turned into a "cow" and they acted rationally with how to deal
with him. I didn't know that the creators were also trying to play at the
transfer of a soul into another body, or metempsychosis. I personally don't
believe in such a thing, but it is an interesting concept. And it makes sense
how the cow's soul was transferred to Hassan which would explain his sudden
change. However, wouldn't that mean that he would have two souls and why would
the cow's soul be the dominant one? It doesn't really make much sense how his
attachment to his cow, his strange affectionate relationship was powerful
enough to change his entire life. I don't even know if you could call it love
because the cow provided him with milk and he might have felt special having
the only cow in the village. The film didn't do much in that aspect to show how
strong the relationship of the two was. It felt like more like he had an
obsession with an object, that he wanted to maintain.
No comments:
Post a Comment