Both “Mother India” and “Fire” were aptly named.
Though both of these pieces were about controversial subjects dealing
with female characters, their respective titles reflect the different types of
stories being explored by the film makers and the audience as well. Motherhood and the duties that come with that
title are examined in “Mother India” while lust, love and tradition are
evaluated in “Fire.”
What was interesting in “Mother
India” was the modern take on a marriage built on love that was followed by the
devastating act of having to kill one’s own child. Many parents would rather die themselves than
see their child die before them so to say that the protagonist of “Mother India”
ends as a heroine is debatable. Even if
done for a greater good who can say what inner effects such an act could have
on a parent? And not only is the mother killing an image of herself but also an
image of the man she loved.
The heroines of “Fire” have a more
defined type of victory. They defy their
over bearing husbands and the hardnosed tradition that only a man and woman
should be physically united and run away to create a new life. Theirs is the story of people who leave their
old families behind to create a new one.
But it must be noted that while they manage to shed the chains of such
old traditions they do not have to worry about the future of any children. They only need to look after each other.
These female characters were similar
in the fact that they were strong willed, forward thinking and fed up with old
customs. But it is the differences that
are more interesting. Rahda enters in the
contract of marriage with a man she loves and they have children. With modern mature relationships like this
the passion and physical desire does not completely abate but it does lower its
burn because practical things need to occur, like working the fields to feed
the children. For Sita and her lover
though they never reach that point in the film.
Their relationship is built out of frustration and unmet physical
desires. It is sharp and warm like a
fire but it has a very Romeo and Juliet feel about it. At the end of the film these woman are being
showered with rain; this choice should not be ignored as it signals the
different conclusions this love story could have. The rain could be Sita’s affection as she
tends to her lover’s burn wounds or perhaps it is a signal that while they have
gained their freedom the sparks of their romance are cooling.
Laura, while reading your blog a particular sentence stuck out to me, "Their relationship is built out of frustration and unmet physical desires." This concept is completely true and I think it is worth analyzing. If people come together simply out of frustration and a lack of affection, is that really considered 'love' and 'romance' or rather a bond based on similar needs? Also turning the tables, even the men in Middle East society are frustrated with their own marriages because half of the time they didn't even want to get married in the first place, but because of their frustration with family tradition nagging at their foot steps, they too fall into the downward spiral of 'confused love'.
ReplyDelete