Fundamentalism is shown in an extreme
and obvious way in Nair's film, whereas in Hamid's novel I didn't
quite understand what the title meant until near the end. For
money-making and Hollywood-pizaz purposes, I suppose Nair wanted to
make the controversial even more glaring. Changez is anally searched
at the airport, handcuffed by police, and called Osama by a white guy
in a truck who was probably guilty of deflating his tires. All of
these are results of stereotypical Western ideas about
Middle-Eastern-looking, beard-bearing men directly following the 9/11
attacks. The viewer was meant to feel outraged and shocked, and not
subtle so. In the novel, Hamid describes a less dramatic version, or,
perhaps, because the reader is reading about the events as opposed to
viewing them, they seemed less extreme. For example, Hamid doesn't go
into extensive details about the Changez's detainment at the airport.
It is obviously a result of Changez's ethnicity because it was too
coincidental that similar events happened around the same time to
many people looking similarly to Changez. It is understood by the
reader that it was unfair because we come to know Changez's
character, and he is obviously no threat. We don't specifically read
that he is anally probed, though it is believable as a sort of thing
that could happen.
In the novel, the question of why
was Changez a reluctant fundamentalist came to my mind often. I
remember reading about the fundamentals of business when he is first
hired at Underwood Samson, but I don't recall reading much else about
fundamentals until the very end of the novel. A riot broke out where
he and some of his students were protesting, and Changez landed in
jail. He was later associated with one of his students who was
accused of being a zealot, a Muslim fundamentalist, but Changez
believed it wasn't true, despite that amount of press it got. In my
opinion, the purpose of the book being titled “The Reluctant
Fundamentalist” is because Changez decided to go home to be with
his family who was in danger, to just live and not prosper because he
was mourning Erica. The fundamentalist were his family. IT was a
reluctant journey because he was brought up to live the American
dream, and for a period he was prestigious and rich.
Ultimately, from both the novel and
the film, I took away a sense that other countries such as Pakistan
focus on an international American Dream. As a teacher in Pakistan,
Changez lectured to his students that America was not the only nation
capable of being so great. He wanted for Pakistan the things he loved
about America. Changez saw America killing ruthlessly in the war on
terrorism. He believed Pakistan was better than that, and could be a
place to prosper just as America was, if only Pakistan could rely
less on outside sources for domestic and foreign affairs (179). When
I went to Delaware County Community College, I met many diasporic
students who left places like Russia, Japan, and India to come to
America for a chance to be a student and find a prosperous job just
as Changez did. I think international students become diasporic,
because once they've had a taste of a prosperous place like America,
they can never go home and view their house, their family, or even
their own values in the same way.
Jessica,
ReplyDeleteGreat post. I'm thinking about how 9/11 really changed Changez, and not only because he was racially-targeted and made feel suspect. I'm thinking that his reluctant fundamentalism is less his loss of the American Dream, and more his awareness of the injustices pursuing such a dream causes.
Your reading of both the film and book are similar to mine. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
Spring
Jessica,
ReplyDeleteI'm think the Amrican dream VS. Pakistani dream, or any other dream for that matter are probably just the same. many cultures encourage their children to be hard-working, have a family and some sort of status in their communities. So maybe it isn't just the American dream anymore but a international dream.