I found
that the inexpensiveness of And So Angels
Die affected the way I viewed it. I’ve found this to be true with a few of
the other films we’ve seen. While viewing it, I found myself kind of
disregarding the film and drawing immediate conclusions, like the film was no
good because of its low-budget feel. I’m so accustomed to Hollywood or European
made films that I lack appreciation for anything else. Having said that, I feel
like even if the film didn’t seem like a homemade film and were of a higher quality,
I still don’t know if I would have enjoyed it. I could never seem to focus all
of my attention on the action or the plot. It was a bit dry.
I was
surprised to hear that And So Angels Die
was an alleged remake of Black Girl.
Aside from both protagonists being diasporic, I was unable to see how else the
two films related. I think that these films are made for a European audience.
It’s kind of like they’re both attempting to display the effects that the
French still have on Senegal even after the independence. I’m not quite sure of
the symbolism of the shoe in And So
Angels Die, if it even was a symbol. I don’t understand why it was so
important that his foot fit into the shoe. Does it have to do with social
status?
I completely agree with your lack of attention to And So Angels Die because of the low-budget feel. It is hard to take a film seriously when the actors and actresses are even worse at acting than soap opera stars. I have a hard time watching movies from before 2000 because the quality (especially with special effects!) is terrible! It really draws your attention away from the important aspects of the film.
ReplyDelete