I think this was by far my favorite
movie that was shown in this class. For once, I was fully engaged in the film
from beginning to end and could not wait to finish the rest of it. I also thoroughly
enjoyed reading the play since it took grabbed my attention. The film was
simple but had so much going on. Who knew a movie about three people in one
room could make for such an intense thriller. There was always suspense and it
really kept me hooked. The book did a good job of describing the scenes and
helping paint the image for the reader which I think is necessary in order to understand
the severity of the situation.
I found myself conflicted with the
characters in regards to the movie and the play. In the play I was not annoyed
by any of the characters actions and I sympathized with Paulina the entire time.
I was not bothered by her husband in the play but I was in the film. The film
did a better job of showing who the characters really are and how they were
reacting to the situation. It was hard to notice all of it in the play itself.
While watching the film I was constantly angered by the husband because he was
such a pushover. He lacked backbone and worried too much. It made him seem weak
and useless. I appreciated his role though because no movie should have only actors
or actresses that everyone likes. As for Dr. Miranda I was only bothered by his
strange accent he acquired when saying certain things, I found it distracting
even though it’s such a minor thing. He played his role well and it made me
hate him for lying and for potentially having hurt women.
As for Paulina, I was back and forth
with her in the film unlike with the play. Most of the time, I felt bad for Paulina
and all that she endured when she was held captive. However, I also was highly
annoyed with her and wanted to yell at her a few times. She was powerful and
independent at times which made me root for her. At other times she needed too
much attention and interrupted everyone. She needed to just sit back and listen
instead of jumping in every three seconds. She can’t get a confession if all
she does is talk nonstop. She was too pushy at times and even treated her
husband terribly. She yelled at him and forced him to play along and did not
take his thoughts into consideration. She got off topic so often like when she
asked her husband how many times he slept with a certain woman. It bothered me
that she could not let a single thing in life go.
Despite all of this character
annoyance, I enjoyed that it made me feel so many emotions and made me think. The Reluctant Fundamentalist did not keep my attention
the same way and I despised the book in comparison to the movie. Death and the
Maiden kept the two similar expect the film was more vulgar and the ending was
explained differently. The Reluctant Fundamentalist was entirely different all
together and the movie was the only tolerable one of the two. I barely even
recall what all happened in the film.
Film is made to be more vulgar
because it grabs attention to see and hear things a certain way. A book cannot
depict as much emotion or tone of voice. They have to increase the entertaining
aspect for films since people expect much more visual excitement from them.
Books are only able to describe and attempt to help you see something or
someone. A movie can actually make you feel as if you are part of what is
happening and actually witnessing it. Also, books include more to them in most
cases because films are so elaborate that they can only include so much unless
they make a super long movie.
I agree with you that Paulina's actions in the film were somewhat "over the top", but in a way that's why I prefer that character versus the one in the book. She appears to be very needy of attention, but it's insane for them not to treat her in any other way considering the ludicrous circumstances they are all under because of her! I don't know if I was the only one who noticed, but the film appeared to be quite satirical in the earlier scenes. Even as the suspense levels were high, the actors seemed to be quite sarcastic and almost humorous with one another which is the last thing you expect when someone's life is on the life. I developed the same feelings for Gerardo's character as well, but once again under the circumstances he was under he had little choice than to comply with his wife. In the play, I feel that his role was almost irrelevant because for many scenes he was not present, and even at the end he wasn't there for Miranda's confession. He leaves his wife, trusting her to let the doctor go safely, when in reality Miranda would've probably attacked her for what she's done to him.
ReplyDelete