I read “A Small Place” before
viewing “Life and Debt” in class. The book was dull in areas but I felt that it
was because there were no specific characters or a story plot. It was just a description
of life in Antigua. The author did a great job of helping me visualize the
island since there were no real clear pictures to go along with the book. However,
my only problem is that she spent so much time bashing the United States and
Europe when she now currently resides in Vermont. Why live in a country that
you so strongly dislike for “ruining” your home country? I find it to be a
contradiction and hypocritical. As for the movie, it was full of images and
personal interviews, but managed to be twice as dull as the book was. I could
barely focus on the film and I saw others falling asleep as well. It just
seemed to drag on and on. My problem with the film “Life and Debt” was the fact
that it used “A Small Place” throughout it but they were written about two
entirely different countries. Yes they have gone through similar things
politically and culturally, but they are still not identical and therefore
should not be described in the same ways.
I understand that the United States
and Europe have not made it easy for people in Jamaica or Antigua, but no
policy or industry will ever be perfect. The United States could not remain
powerful or survive as a country if we just gave away money and did not take
control in various industrial or political aspects. These countries rely on
outside support to survive so they now must deal with the downfalls of this outside
assistance. I do not entirely agree with how we control their countries in numerous
ways but I do understand that they have asked for our help. They have brought
it on themselves by wanting our involvement and financial assistance. Every
country has debt they have to pay off including the United States. We do not
blame other countries for our misfortunes or problems in society, but yet this
book and film do just that. They make very problem in their country look like it’s
the Europeans’ and Americans’ faults. Yes they were once owned by Europeans but
they were given freedom they never seemed to manage or to be able to care for
themselves. Some business problems they face are due to us but not all their
other numerous medical, social, and environmental conflicts.
Not once in the film or book did they
mention anything good that the United States or Europe has done for them.
Tourism brings them a good amount of their income but all they did was bash it.
Why should the United States or Europe help at all if we can find other cheaper
ways of producing goods and do not need their countries’ products? However, the
United States and Europe still attempt to make something work such as creating
factories for them all to work in. Yes the factories did not work out but at
least it shows effort and it’s better than doing nothing at all.
I
do not think it will ever be possible for Antigua and Jamaica to survive on
their own and be self-sustaining. They have dropped to such terrible lows economically
and industrially and they have fallen so much in debt that they may never get
out of it. I do think the United States and Europe have helped them hit rock
bottom but the governments of these poor countries need to get a handle on
things to attempt to improve their overall livelihood as the countries that
they “once” represented and were proud of. I think once countries reach out to
other countries for help or assistance, the country asking for help will never
be full self-reliant again. It’s a nasty cycle that most countries seem to have
fallen into including the United States. The sharing of finances and political
advice can sometimes do more damage than good.
As for the idea of tourist versus a native, it gets to be
a situation of “blurred lines.” So many people these days have dual citizenship
or have links to multiple countries. Natives are people who were born in said
country and have lived the original or set customs of that particular region or
culture. Natives are aware of how things were originally in comparison to how
they are now. The writer of A Small Place would be considered a native in a
sense. She was born there and experienced a life there for many years. The only
problem is, natives often stay in said country and she moved to the United
States. Natives are the people born and raised in a country and currently live
in said country. You can be born a native but then lose that title throughout
life by changing your customs and lifestyle. Tourists are people who visit
countries but do not really see what they truly are about. Tourists see the
makeshift culture that they want to see in the world, not the real life culture
that exists there. They cannot truly understand the place they are in unless
they submerse themselves in it and stay for a long period of time.
No comments:
Post a Comment