While watching the film “The Cow”
by Mehrjui many thoughts ran through my head. After reading the
analysis of film maker Mehrjui and of the writer of the work of
fiction the movie was adapted from “The Cow” by Saedi, I had even
stranger thoughts. In the beginning I felt sympathetic to the man,
the mentally challenged son of Saffar being tortured, until later in
the movie I realized he maybe was in on the fun. During the movie, I
kept waiting for that to play a role, but the focus was more on
Hassan and his odd love for the cow. Because my mind always seems to
go to 'dirty' thoughts, I kept wondering why anyone would prefer a
cow to the company of their wife. I fully realize that because I was
raised on American films where everything, especially children's
films (often with animals) is sexualized. So, while Hassan giggling
madly while feeding and bathing his cow, getting jealous when others
(the village children) try to touch his cow, might seem 'platonic', I
just can't help wonder if Hassan's love had an underlying bestiality
aspect to it, especially since his love drove him to insanity as he
jumped down a cliff.
Another recurring thought of mine is
why would anyone make a film that is sort of about a man's love for
his cow, but also about a town who seems to have to think really hard
just to come up with a really terrible idea that the beloved cow ran
away while pregnant, that winds up not even working? Fortunately, the
reading cleared up some of my questions, and I know see the more
in-depth and philosophical side of the film and of the literary
writer Saedi. Dabashi writes that Saedi was revolutionary in his
thinking about anxiety, stress, and psychosis. As a psychiatrist and
sociologist, his travels enabled him to scientifically analyze people
and then portray it ingeniously. He came up with many fictional
pieces of work that were meant to show that man has a reality that is
commonly known ie agreeing this book is in fact a book, and then a
man simultaneously has his own reality that gives meaning to the book
unique to himself, but that he still just calls reality.
For Hassan it seems the cow was his
whole life, some would argue his whole being, as he basically becomes
the creature he loved (121). This idea of transmigration is something
that has been around for centuries in the Islam religion and present
in Persian stories and culture. Realizing the significance of
transmigration makes me feel silly for not seeing it in the film, but
honestly I couldn't get passed all the strange grunting and heavy
petting Hassan displayed on camera, especially as it contrasted all
the other rather mild and typical old-school scenes of this black and
white film. As a 23 year old movie lover, I have been brain-washed to
expect flashiness in my films, and for the film makers to basically
slap you in the face with the theme. With that being sad, I much
prefer the ambigiousness of “The Cow” and believe that if I were
to watch it again, I would have much more to think about in terms of
the psychological aspects of the film.
Jessica,
ReplyDeleteI also really liked the ambiguity from The Cow. I'm glad I wasn't the only one who thought Hassan was getting a little bit too intimate with the cow. I found the whole bathing scene to be a bit strange. It can be seen that he really does love the cow perhaps the way that we today might love a dog or a cat. This can be seen when he plays keep-away with the cow while she eats hay. Also giving his cow an amulet to wear was something I found really interesting because a lot of people will choose to "bedazzle" their dog/cat's collar (I personally don't get it).
I agree with you that the cow was his whole life, and I actually wonder if the village came up with the lie about the cow because they too couldn't handle the loss of Hassan's cow. It seems as if they heavily relied on the cow for sustenance. Perhaps the truth was too much for them to handle.